Discover the Carolingian Collapse, the gradual disintegration of Charlemagne’s vast empire during the 9th century. Learn how internal divisions, external invasions, and weakened central authority led to the fragmentation of the Carolingian realm, paving the way for the rise of feudalism and the emergence of new European kingdoms.
Carolingian Collapse
| Historical Fact | Carolingian Collapse |
| Time Period | 9th to 10th centuries CE |
| Key Figures | Louis the Pious, Charles the Bald, Louis the German, Lothair I |
| Main Causes | Dynastic divisions, civil wars, weak successors, external invasions (Vikings, Magyars, Saracens), administrative overreach |
| Major Events | Treaty of Verdun (843 CE), Viking raids, decline of royal authority, rise of local nobility |
| Political Impact | Fragmentation of the Carolingian Empire into smaller kingdoms; weakening of central rule |
| Economic Impact | Decline in trade, ruralization of the economy, reliance on local self-sufficiency |
| Cultural Impact | Decline of centralized learning and art patronage; shift toward regional cultures |
| Social Consequences | Rise of feudalism and manorialism; growing power of local lords and knights |
| Legacy | Foundation for modern European kingdoms such as France, Germany, and Italy; transition from empire to feudal Europe |
Carolingian Collapse
Introduction
The Carolingian Collapse marks the decline and fragmentation of the empire established by Charlemagne in the 8th and 9th centuries. Once the dominant political and cultural power in Western Europe, the Carolingian Empire began to weaken soon after Charlemagne’s death in 814 CE. His successors struggled to maintain unity across vast and diverse territories. A combination of internal strife, dynastic disputes, and the devastating impact of Viking, Magyar, and Saracen invasions eroded imperial control. Over time, regional rulers gained autonomy, and centralized authority gave way to local power structures, setting the stage for the emergence of medieval feudal Europe.
The Civil war
Charlemagne’s efforts to create a unified empire did not long outlast Charlemagne himself. His son, Louis the Pious (r. 814 – 840), succeeded him as emperor. Louis continued Charlemagne’s project of Church reform; unlike Charlemagne, who had had only one son to survive into adulthood, Louis had three. In addition, his eldest, Lothar, had already rebelled against him in the 830s. When Louis died, Lothar went to war with Louis’s other two sons, Charles the Bald and Louis the German.
Treaty of Verdun
This civil war proved to be inconclusive, and, at the 843 Treaty of Verdun, the Carolingian Empire was divided among the brothers. Charles the Bald took the lands in the west of the Empire, which would go on to be known first as West Francia and then, eventually, France. To the East, the largely German-speaking region of Saxony and Bavaria went to Louis the German. Lothar, although he had received the title of emperor, received only northern Italy and the land between Charles’s and Louis’s kingdoms.
Splitting is not uncommon.
This division of a kingdom was not unusual for the Franks—but it meant that there would be no restoration of a unified Empire in the West, although both the king of Francia and the rulers of Central Europe would each claim to be Charlemagne’s successors.
Age of invasions
Western Europe faced worse problems than civil war between the descendants of Charlemagne. In the centuries following the rise of the post-Roman Germanic kingdoms, Western Europe had suffered comparatively few invasions. The ninth and tenth centuries, by contrast, would be an “age of invasions.”
Norse or Viking invasion
In the north of Europe, in the region known as Scandinavia, a people called the Norse had lived for centuries before. These were Germanic peoples, but one whose culture was not assimilated to the post-Roman world of the Carolingian west. They were still pagan and had a culture that, like that of other Germanic peoples, was quite warlike. Their population had increased; additionally, Norse kings tended to exile defeated enemies. These Norsemen would often take up raiding other peoples, and when they took up this activity, they were known as Vikings.
Reasons for the Viking invasions
One factor that allowed Norse raids on Western Europe was an improvement in their construction of ships. Their ships were long, flexible, and also had a shallow enough draft that they did not need harbors so could be pulled up along any beach. Moreover, they were also shallow enough of draft that they could sail up rivers for hundreds of miles. What this feature of these ships meant was that Norse V ikings could strike at many different regions, often with very little warning.
Weakness of the states
Even more significant for the Norse attacks was that Western Europe in the ninth and tenth centuries was made up of weak states. The three successor kingdoms to Charlemagne’s empire were often split by civil war. Although King Charles the Bald (r. 843 – 877) enjoyed some successes against the Vikings, his realm in general was subject to frequent raids. England’s small kingdoms were particularly vulnerable. From 793, England had suffered numerous Viking raids, and these raids increased in size and scope over the ninth century. Likewise, to the west, Ireland, with its chiefs and petty kings, lacked the organization of a state necessary to deal with sustained incursions.
Viking settlement
The result was that not only did Viking raids on the British Isles increase in scope and intensity over the ninth century, but also the Norse eventually came to take lands and settle.
Defeat of the Vikings
To the south and west, al-Andalus suffered fewer Norse attacks than did the rest of Europe. A sophisticated, organized state with a regular army and a network of fortresses, it was able to effectively deal with raiders. The Spanish emir Abd-al Rahman II defeated a Viking raid and sent the Moroccan ambassador the severed heads of 200 Vikings to show how successful he had been in defending against them.
Kingdom of Rus
To the east, the Norse sailed along the rivers that stretched through the forests and steppes of the area that today makes up Russia and Ukraine. The Slavic peoples living there had a comparatively weak social organization, so in many instances they fell under Norse domination. The Norsemen Rurik and Oleg were said to have established themselves as rulers of Slavic peoples as well as the princedoms of Novgorod and Kiev, respectively, in the ninth century. These kingdoms of Slavic subjects and Norse masters became known as the Rus.
Less success for the Norse
Further to the south, the Norse would often move their ships over land between rivers until finally reaching the Black Sea and thus Constantinople and Byzantium. Although on occasion a Norse raid would have great success against Byzantine forces, in general, a powerful and organized state meant that, as with al-Andalus, the Norse encountered less success.
The North African invaders
Norse invaders were not the only threat faced by Western Europe. As the emirs of Muslim North Africa gradually broke away from the centralized rule of the Abbasid Caliphate, these emirs, particularly those of Tunisia, what is today Algeria, and Morocco turned to legitimate themselves by raid and plunder; this aggression was often directed at southern Francia and Italy. The Aghlabid emirs in particular not only seized control of Sicily, but also sacked the city of Rome itself in 846. North African raiders would often seize territory on the coasts of Southern Europe and raid European shipping in order to increase their own control of trade and commerce. In addition, the emirs of these North African states would use the plunder from their attacks to reward followers, in another example of the pillage and gift system.
Invasion of the Magyars
Central Europe also faced attacks, these from the Magyars, a steppe people. The Magyars had been forced out of Southeastern Europe by another steppe people, the Pechenegs, and so from 899 on migrated into Central Europe, threatening the integrity of East Francia. As was the case with other steppe peoples, their raids on horseback targeted people in small unfortified communities, avoiding larger settlements. They eventually settled in the plains of Eastern Europe to found the state of Hungary; although they made Hungary their primary location, they nevertheless continued to raid East Francia through the first part of the tenth century.
Conclusion
The Carolingian Collapse was a pivotal turning point in European history, marking the end of attempts to sustain a unified Western Empire after Charlemagne. The combination of dynastic fragmentation, external invasions, and the erosion of imperial authority dismantled the centralized structure that once bound Western Europe together. In its place emerged a new political and social order based on local power and personal loyalty — the beginnings of feudalism. Though the Carolingian legacy faded, its institutions, cultural achievements, and the ideal of Christian kingship profoundly influenced the shape of medieval Europe and the development of emerging nations such as France and Germany.
(FAQ) about Carolingian Collapse ?
1. What was the Carolingian Collapse?
The Carolingian Collapse refers to the decline and disintegration of the Carolingian Empire during the 9th and 10th centuries, following Charlemagne’s death. It marked the end of centralized imperial rule in Western Europe.
2. What were the main causes of the Carolingian Collapse?
Key causes included dynastic disputes among Charlemagne’s heirs, civil wars, weak leadership, administrative difficulties, and repeated invasions by Vikings, Magyars, and Saracens.
3. What was the Treaty of Verdun, and why was it important?
Signed in 843 CE, the Treaty of Verdun divided the Carolingian Empire among Charlemagne’s grandsons, creating the kingdoms that would later evolve into modern France, Germany, and Italy. It marked the official fragmentation of the empire.
4. How did the collapse affect European society?
The collapse led to the rise of feudalism, as local lords gained power and provided protection in exchange for loyalty. Central authority weakened, and Europe became a mosaic of semi-independent territories.
5. What role did external invasions play in the collapse?
Continuous raids by Vikings, Magyars, and Saracens destabilized the empire, drained resources, and forced local leaders to assume defense responsibilities, weakening imperial control.
6. What was the long-term legacy of the Carolingian Collapse?
Despite its fall, the Carolingian Empire left a lasting legacy in the form of revived learning, Christian governance, and the political foundations of medieval Europe, influencing the rise of later European kingdoms.


